sjat/boma
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

accepted-risks: add R4 (no cryptographic WORM for logs)

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
sjat 2026-06-06 07:03:27 +02:00
parent 30c6a93c28
commit 6f68f8b8c5
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

3
docs/security/accepted-risks.md
View file

@ -16,8 +16,9 @@ revisit (trigger).
| R1 | **Active supply-chain scanning deferred** — baseline hygiene *is* required (tiered image pinning per ADR-011 — stateful `tag@digest`, stateless rolling — prefer official/verified images; gitleaks), but images and dependencies are not actively vulnerability-scanned (Trivy/Grype) or signature-verified | Scanning only pays off with the capacity to triage its output; the realistic threat is opportunistic, not a targeted supply-chain attack | A monitoring/triage stack is live; hosting high-value data/finances for others; a relevant upstream compromise | | R1 | **Active supply-chain scanning deferred** — baseline hygiene *is* required (tiered image pinning per ADR-011 — stateful `tag@digest`, stateless rolling — prefer official/verified images; gitleaks), but images and dependencies are not actively vulnerability-scanned (Trivy/Grype) or signature-verified | Scanning only pays off with the capacity to triage its output; the realistic threat is opportunistic, not a targeted supply-chain attack | A monitoring/triage stack is live; hosting high-value data/finances for others; a relevant upstream compromise |
| R2 | **SELinux not used** — no SELinux mandatory access control | AppArmor — Debian-native and enforced via the CIS baseline — already provides MAC; adding SELinux means two MAC systems, non-native to Debian, for no real gain | A service that ships and requires its own SELinux policy; threat model shifts toward targeted attackers | | R2 | **SELinux not used** — no SELinux mandatory access control | AppArmor — Debian-native and enforced via the CIS baseline — already provides MAC; adding SELinux means two MAC systems, non-native to Debian, for no real gain | A service that ships and requires its own SELinux policy; threat model shifts toward targeted attackers |
| R3 | **Self-hosted mesh control plane is a public target on `askari`** — the NetBird coordinator (ADR-016) exposes a management API + dashboard (TCP 80/443) and Coturn (UDP 3478) on `askari`'s public IP; the management API controls the whole mesh | Self-hosting means **no third-party trust** and an off-site control plane that survives a homelab outage (boma's sovereignty ethos). Residual surface is on `askari` (already a public VPS) and is mitigated: TLS + embedded-IdP login, source-IP restriction where practical, `base` hardening, version-pinned NetBird (ADR-011) patched on boma's cadence | A coordinator compromise or unpatched NetBird CVE; the management plane is reachable without auth/IP-limits; the operational burden makes a hosted coordinator worth reconsidering | | R3 | **Self-hosted mesh control plane is a public target on `askari`** — the NetBird coordinator (ADR-016) exposes a management API + dashboard (TCP 80/443) and Coturn (UDP 3478) on `askari`'s public IP; the management API controls the whole mesh | Self-hosting means **no third-party trust** and an off-site control plane that survives a homelab outage (boma's sovereignty ethos). Residual surface is on `askari` (already a public VPS) and is mitigated: TLS + embedded-IdP login, source-IP restriction where practical, `base` hardening, version-pinned NetBird (ADR-011) patched on boma's cadence | A coordinator compromise or unpatched NetBird CVE; the management plane is reachable without auth/IP-limits; the operational burden makes a hosted coordinator worth reconsidering |
| R4 | **No cryptographic WORM for logs** — shipped logs are append-only via Loki's push API and copied off-site to `askari` (ADR-018), but the stored chunks are not object-locked/immutable; a root-on-`askari` attacker could edit history | Append-only push + off-site copy already defeats the realistic threat (a host attacker covering tracks survives even full-cluster compromise). True WORM (object-lock) is forensic-grade cost for boma's opportunistic threat model (R1) | Threat model shifts toward targeted/forensic; a regulatory/evidentiary need appears; `askari` itself is assessed as a likely target |
_Last reviewed: 2026-06-05. The prior gaps (full CIS hardening, SELinux/AppArmor, _Last reviewed: 2026-06-06. The prior gaps (full CIS hardening, SELinux/AppArmor,
IDS) were re-challenged and **adopted rather than accepted**: CIS Debian L1+L2 + CIS IDS) were re-challenged and **adopted rather than accepted**: CIS Debian L1+L2 + CIS
Docker, AppArmor (enforce), AIDE file-integrity, and Suricata network IDS are now Docker, AppArmor (enforce), AIDE file-integrity, and Suricata network IDS are now
part of the security strategy (ADR-002). See STATUS.md / `docs/TODO.md` for build part of the security strategy (ADR-002). See STATUS.md / `docs/TODO.md` for build