feat(backup): backup strategy foundation layer (ADR-022)

Plan 1 of the backup & DR strategy: ADR-022, per-service backup__* contract +
BACKUP.md governance (template + checklist gate + new-role runbook step + dormant
/check-backup), and hardware/CAPABILITIES updates. Docs-only; the backup role and
live restore testing are Plans 2-3.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
sjat 2026-06-10 11:32:36 +02:00
commit 9be4366ac3
11 changed files with 406 additions and 17 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
---
description: Backup-coverage verification (ADR-022) — proves a service's declared backup state is actually captured.
---
Verify that a service's **declared** backup data (`backup__*`) is actually captured in
the backup repo, so the verifier and `BACKUP.md` can never disagree (the ADR-021 pattern,
applied to backups). Argument: a service/role name (e.g. `/check-backup nextcloud`).
**Dormant until the backup node exists** (Plan 2/3): with no `fisi` repo to query, this
command reports `not-yet-available` rather than failing.
## Preconditions
- `roles/<name>/` carries `backup__*` data (or `backup__state: false` with a reason).
- The backup node (`fisi`) is reachable and its restic repo exists. If not → report
`not-yet-available` and stop.
## Checks (when live)
Load the `backup__*` data for the resolved role, then:
| Check | How | Green when |
|---|---|---|
| snapshot freshness | `restic snapshots --tag <backup__service> --latest 1` | a snapshot ≤ ~24 h old exists |
| paths present | the latest snapshot contains every `backup__paths` entry | all declared paths present |
| dumps present | the snapshot contains every `backup__dumps[*].dest` | all declared dumps present |
| integrity | `restic check --read-data-subset` (sampled) | no errors |
Report per-check pass/fail; a stateless role (`backup__state: false`) reports `n/a (stateless)`.

View file

@ -89,6 +89,9 @@ Full design rationale: `docs/decisions/`
- Every **service** role must have a populated `VERIFY.md` (ADR-008/017) — copy `docs/testing/service-verify-template.md`
- Every **service** role must have a populated `ACCESS.md` (ADR-021) — copy
`docs/access/service-access-template.md`; rendered from the role's `access__*` data
- Every **service** role that holds state must have a populated `BACKUP.md` (ADR-022) —
copy `docs/backup/service-backup-template.md`; rendered from the role's `backup__*`
data. A stateless service records `backup__state: false` with a reason.
- One service = one self-contained role; no shared multi-service roles (ADR-004)
- Role names: `snake_case`, descriptive nouns (`base`, `docker_host`, `reverse_proxy`)
- Use `make new-role NAME=<name>` to scaffold — never create role structure by hand
@ -227,6 +230,7 @@ Single-contributor, trunk-based (no merge requests / approval gates):
| Tagging & run-targeting | `docs/decisions/019-tagging.md` |
| Firewall strategy | `docs/decisions/020-firewall.md` |
| Operational access | `docs/decisions/021-operational-access.md` |
| Backup & disaster recovery | `docs/decisions/022-backup.md` |
| Adding a new role | `docs/runbooks/new-role.md` |
| Adding a new host | `docs/runbooks/new-host.md` |
| Rotating vault secrets | `docs/runbooks/rotate-secrets.md` |

View file

@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ So `make deploy PLAYBOOK=site` is still incomplete — `base` is only partially
| `ssh-from-control` firewall source | ADR-021 / ADR-020 | **Built (dormant).** `base__firewall_control_addr` knob + nftables rule + Molecule assertion landed; empty default = no rule until `ubongo`'s LAN address is set in `group_vars`. |
| `/check-access` verifier | ADR-021 | **Design RESOLVED** (`.claude/commands/check-access.md` authored). **Build pending:** running needs `ubongo` + live/staging hosts + vault. Access analogue of `/verify-service` (ADR-017). |
| Per-service `ACCESS.md` records | ADR-021 | Template + governance present; per-service files render when each service role is built. |
| Backup `backup` role + `backup_hosts` group | ADR-022 | Does not exist. Pull node (`fisi`), restic repo, rclone→pCloud, USB air-gap — Plan 2. |
| Per-service `backup__*` contract + `BACKUP.md` | ADR-022 | Convention defined; inert until service roles exist to declare against. |
## Keeping this honest

View file

@ -104,9 +104,9 @@ role from a shared `group_vars` service catalog. The host `nftables` layer is bu
| Capability | Candidate service(s) | Tier | Commitment | What it does | Notes / open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Databases | Postgres/MariaDB — central *vs* per-app | P | candidate | Backing store for stateful apps | Open: central server vs per-service (TODO 3.9) |
| Backup engine | Proxmox Backup Server · restic | P | planned | VM backups (PBS) + file/DB dumps (restic) | TODO 3.8 |
| Off-site target | pCloud | S | planned | Off-site copy of backups (3-2-1) | |
| Air-gap target | USB hard drives | S | maybe-later | Periodic cold/air-gapped copy | Manual rotation |
| Backup engine | restic (data-only) | S | planned | Per-service state: file dirs + logical DB dumps, pulled by `fisi` | ADR-022 (PBS deferred) |
| Off-site target | pCloud (via rclone) | S | planned | Encrypted off-site copy of the restic repo (3-2-1) | ADR-022; sync-coupled |
| Air-gap target | USB hard drives | S | planned | Rotated offline cold copy — the immutable backstop | ADR-022; udev-triggered `restic copy` |
## 10. Operations & support — [S]

View file

@ -39,7 +39,10 @@
7. ~~Define a tagging standard that lets us target runs without over-tagging.~~
DECIDED (ADR-019): two-tier — role-name tags (auto, at play level) + a closed
9-tag concern list (`tests/tags.yml`); union-only targeting; enforced by `make lint`.
8. Ensure the right things are backed up (incl. database dumps if we land on PBS).
8. ~~Ensure the right things are backed up (incl. database dumps if we land on PBS).~~
DECIDED (ADR-022): data-only restic (Model A, no PBS) pulled by an off-cluster
node (`fisi`); per-service `backup__*` + `BACKUP.md`; logical DB dumps; 3-2-1 via
pCloud + rotated USB air-gap. Build: Plans 23.
9. Decide: a central database server, or individual database services per app?
10. Should we keep the custom base-container (Molecule test image) method for role testing, or revisit it as boma's testing approach matures (ADR-008)?
11. ~~Deliberate tagging strategy.~~ DECIDED (ADR-019) — folded into 3.7.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
# Per-service backup record — template
Copy this file to `roles/<service>/BACKUP.md` when building a **stateful** service
role (ADR-022). It is the per-service **backup record**: what state the service holds,
how it is captured consistently, and how it is restored. The structured parts are
**rendered from the role's `backup__*` data** (the single source of truth that also
drives `/check-backup`) — keep the data authoritative and regenerate this file rather
than hand-editing the tables. The prose "Restore notes" tail is hand-written.
A **stateless** service (holds no persistent data) does not get a `BACKUP.md`; it sets
`backup__state: false` with a reason in its role defaults instead.
Delete this preamble in the copy and start from the heading below.
---
# Backup — <service>
## State captured
Rendered from `backup__*`:
| What | Source | How captured |
|---|---|---|
| data dir(s) | `<backup__paths[*]>` | file-level, pulled read-only |
| database | `<backup__dumps[*].cmd>``<backup__dumps[*].dest>` | logical dump (default; ADR-022 Decision 7) |
- **Quiesce:** `<backup__quiesce>``true` means the service is stopped → backed up →
restarted (escape hatch for data that cannot be dumped live; ADR-022 Decision 7 B).
- **RPO:** ~24 h (nightly; ADR-022 Decision 2).
## Restore procedure
1. Re-provision the host (Terraform) and redeploy this role (Ansible) — Model A.
2. `restic restore` the latest snapshot for `<backup__service>` into `<backup__paths>`.
3. Replay each `<backup__dumps[*].dest>` into its database.
4. Confirm with this role's `VERIFY.md` checks (ADR-008/017).
## Restore notes
Prose the data can't capture — ordering gotchas, "restore the DB before the data dir",
known-tricky migrations.
- <none yet>

View file

@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
# ADR-022 — Backup & disaster recovery: data-only restic, off-cluster pull node, 3-2-1
## Status
Accepted (2026-06-10). Resolves TODO 3.8 ("ensure the right things are backed up,
incl. DB dumps") and `CAPABILITIES.md` §9 (backup engine / off-site / air-gap, all
"planned"). Grounds ADR-011's "backup-first" and "snapshot + backup" language, which
assumed a backup policy existed but never defined one.
**Doctrine ADR.** It pins the recovery model, backup engine, topology, per-service
contract, encryption/escrow, restore-testing tiers, retention, alerting, and USB
air-gap mechanism. It does **not** build any of them — the `backup` role, `fisi`
node, per-service `backup__*` declarations, and `BACKUP.md` files do not exist yet.
Designed now, built in the implementation plan referenced at the foot of this ADR.
## Context
boma has no defined backup policy. The ADRs assume one exists — ADR-011 makes
"backup-first" the rule for stateful upgrades and "snapshot + backup" the rollback
path — but nothing specifies *what* gets backed up, *how* it stays consistent, *where*
copies live, *how* they are encrypted, or *whether restores actually work*.
`CAPABILITIES.md` §9 sketches an intent (PBS + restic, pCloud off-site, USB air-gap)
but commits to nothing.
The gap is not just theoretical. Every boma service is stateful in some dimension:
DB contents, bind-mount data dirs, the Vaultwarden vault that holds every secret in
the stack. Without a backup policy the IaC is not reproducible from nothing; it is
reproducible-modulo-data. This ADR closes that gap.
## Decision
### 1. Recovery model — data-only backups, rebuild from code (Model A)
boma's *configuration* is reproducible from this repo: Terraform recreates the VM,
Ansible re-renders the Docker Compose stack. Backups therefore protect **state only**
DB contents, bind-mount data dirs, Vaultwarden's vault — not whole-VM images.
Recovery sequence: Terraform re-provisions the VM → Ansible redeploys → restic
restores the data. **No Proxmox Backup Server (PBS) in v1.** This keeps the 3-2-1
topology cheap, fits pCloud's 1 TB comfortably, and turns every restore drill into
a continuous proof that the IaC *and* the backups both work.
Trade-off accepted: recovery is slower than a VM-image restore (a full Ansible run
plus data restore, potentially hours), and it bets the repo is complete enough to
rebuild from nothing — which Tier-2 restore testing (Decision 8) exists to verify.
**PBS (Model B) or a per-host hybrid (Model C) can be added later** if real-world RTO
proves too slow; nothing here precludes it.
### 2. One backup tier, ~24 h RPO
A single tier: nightly backup of all state, accepting up to ~24 h of data loss across
the board. No per-data-type tiering yet — revisit once there is real-world data and
experience to justify the added machinery.
### 3. Engine — restic (data) + rclone (off-site); no second encryption layer
- **restic** captures state into an encrypted, deduplicated repository.
- **rclone** replicates the repo to pCloud (pCloud has no good headless Linux client;
rclone has a first-class pCloud backend).
- restic encrypts the repo at rest, so rclone copies **ciphertext only** — no second
encryption layer, no pCloud "crypto folder."
No PBS in v1 (see Decision 1).
### 4. Topology — central pull node (`fisi`), off the cluster; `backup_hosts` group
A single backup node owns the canonical restic repo. It is **off the Proxmox cluster**
— an independent failure domain, so copy 2 survives a PVE node (or the whole cluster)
dying. This mirrors the existing pattern for `ubongo` (control) and `askari`
(off-site): a manually-provisioned physical node in its own inventory group, still
Ansible-managed (the `base` role applies, plus a `backup` role).
**Pull model.** `fisi` holds SSH keys to each host; per service it runs the declared
dump command remotely, pulls the declared paths read-only, then `restic` snapshots the
staged data into its local repo. **Hosts hold no backup credentials and cannot reach
the repo** — a compromised or ransomwared service host cannot delete backup history.
**Node assignment:** `fisi` (an HP Elite 600 G9 tower) is penciled in / provisional —
the *role* ("the backup node") is load-bearing; the physical assignment may be
revisited when all hardware is on hand. `fisi` holds **2× 8 TB HDDs in a mirror**
(ZFS or mdraid → 8 TB usable, survives one disk failure). It owns the repo, runs the
pull orchestration, runs `rclone → pCloud`, and docks the USB air-gap drives
(Decision 11).
**Inventory:** a new `backup_hosts` group is added to both inventories, structured
like `control` and `offsite_hosts`. The `base` role applies.
### 5. 3-2-1 mapping
| Copy | Location | Medium | Off-site? | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Live data on each host | NVMe/SSD | no | The working data |
| 2 | `fisi` restic repo | 8 TB HDD mirror | no (on-site, off-cluster) | Canonical repo |
| 3 | pCloud (via rclone) | Cloud | **yes** | Encrypted ciphertext; **sync-coupled** (see Consequences) |
| +4 | USB air-gap drive(s) | Removable HDD, **offline** | yes (stored off-site) | The **immutable backstop**; rotated |
≥3 copies, ≥2 media, ≥1 off-site — 3-2-1 satisfied, with the air-gap drive as a
fourth, offline copy that no online compromise can reach.
### 6. Per-service backup contract — `backup__*` data + `BACKUP.md`; governance
Each service role declares its backup needs in role vars — the same render-from-data
pattern boma uses for `access__*`/`ACCESS.md` (ADR-021):
```yaml
backup__service: nextcloud # identifier; matches the role / compose project
backup__state: true # false = stateless → no BACKUP.md (pair with a reason)
backup__paths: # bind-mount dirs / files holding state ([] = none)
- /srv/nextcloud/data
backup__dumps: # logical app-consistent dumps ([] = none)
- cmd: "docker compose -p nextcloud exec -T db pg_dump -U {{ vault.nextcloud.db_user }} nextcloud"
dest: nextcloud-db.sql
backup__quiesce: false # true = stop→back up→restart escape hatch (Decision 7 B)
```
The pull orchestrator reads these (rendered from inventory) and, per service: SSH in →
run the dumps → pull the dump files + declared paths read-only → `restic` snapshot. A
service with **no** `backup__paths` must explicitly declare `backup__state: false` with
a reason; omission is never an implicit "nothing to back up." (`backup__state` and the
list-form `backup__dumps` are this ADR's resolution of the spec's open "declared, not
silent" point.)
**`BACKUP.md` becomes a required per-service doc** alongside `SECURITY.md`,
`VERIFY.md`, and `ACCESS.md`, **rendered from the role's `backup__*` data**, documenting:
what state exists, what is backed up, the dump command, and the per-service restore
procedure. A template lives at `docs/backup/service-backup-template.md`. A **stateless**
service declares `backup__state: false` (with a reason) in its role vars and gets **no**
`BACKUP.md`.
**Governance — runbook + gate, not scaffold (consistent with ADR-021).** Three light
touches mirror how `SECURITY.md`, `VERIFY.md`, and `ACCESS.md` are enforced: the
service checklist (`docs/security/service-checklist.md`) gains a backup item; the
`new-role` runbook gains a fill/render/`check-backup` step (copy
`docs/backup/service-backup-template.md` into `roles/<service>/BACKUP.md` and
populate the `backup__*` data); and a checklist gate blocks service clearance until
the record exists and a restore drill confirms it (or a deviation is recorded in
`accepted-risks.md`). The dormant `/check-backup` verifier is the automated check
analogue of `/check-access` (ADR-021). **No automated lint script gates `BACKUP.md`
presence** — same manual-copy-plus-review pattern the sibling records use. The design
document's "make lint gates its presence" wording is superseded by this governance
choice.
### 7. Consistency — logical dumps first; quiesce as escape hatch
- **Default:** databases are captured with logical dumps (`pg_dump` / `mysqldump`) —
portable, version-independent, restorable to a fresh DB. Plain data dirs are backed
up as files. No downtime required.
- **Escape hatch:** a service whose data cannot be dumped live declares a quiesce step
(stop container → back up volume → restart) via `backup__quiesce` in the same contract.
- ZFS/filesystem snapshots are **not** used as the sole DB method (only
crash-consistent for a live database).
This is agnostic to the open central-vs-per-app database question (TODO 3.9): either
way, each service declares how to dump its own data.
### 8. Restore testing — two tiers; `ubongo` stays bare Debian
- **Tier 1 — weekly, automated, rolling restore-verify.** Pick the next service in
rotation, restore its latest snapshot into a throwaway container on `ubongo`
(reusing the Molecule harness, ADR-015), start the app against the restored data,
and run that service's `VERIFY.md` checks (ADR-008/017). This catches the failure
that actually kills people — *silently corrupt or unrestorable backups*. Failures
alert via ntfy.
- **Tier 2 — semi-annual full DR rehearsal,** driven from `ubongo` onto PVE staging.
Rebuild a host from zero via Terraform + Ansible + restic restore on the staging
cluster. This validates the whole Model-A recovery chain. **At least once a year the
rehearsal exercises the paper-secret break-glass path** (Decision 10) end-to-end.
**`ubongo` stays bare Debian, not a hypervisor (ADR-015 unchanged).** Its role is to
be the independent recovery anchor — "the tool used to rebuild the cluster must not
live inside the thing it rebuilds." Higher-fidelity real-VM testing is better served
by the PVE staging environment (same hardware class, same cluster, same provisioning
path). `ubongo`'s 1 TB NVMe gives ample room for Tier-1 dataset restores; disk
headroom (not CPU/RAM) is the first thing to watch as data grows (`/capacity-review`).
### 9. Retention — GFS via restic
Starting policy: `--keep-daily 7 --keep-weekly 4 --keep-monthly 6 --keep-yearly 1`.
`restic forget --prune` runs nightly on `fisi`'s repo; pCloud mirrors the pruned repo.
Tune once real repo growth is observed.
### 10. Encryption + key escrow + break-glass
restic encrypts the repo at rest, so **one secret — the restic repo password —
protects all copies uniformly** (`fisi`, pCloud, USB). One thing to escrow, not three.
**Escrow locations:**
- **`fisi`, root-only** (plus in the Ansible vault) — so backups run non-interactively
and `fisi` is redeployable.
- **Vaultwarden** — the day-to-day human-accessible copy.
- **Paper, in a physical safe (off-site)** — the break-glass root of trust; the only
copy that survives "everything is down."
**The paper holds *two* secrets:** (1) the **restic repo password** (to read any
backup at all) and (2) the **Ansible vault master password** (to rebuild hosts from
the repo — normally from Vaultwarden via `rbw`, which is itself down in a from-zero
recovery). With both on paper, the break-glass chain has **no circular dependency**:
paper → restic restores Vaultwarden + repo data → the vault password (from paper)
drives Terraform/Ansible re-provisioning → services return, `rbw` works again.
**`mamba` (laptop) is the break-glass clone** (ADR-015): repo + toolchain + mesh +
`rbw`, with Terraform state synced to it — the rebuild can be driven from `mamba` if
`ubongo` is also gone. The paper sheet doubles as a short break-glass runbook assuming
zero running boma infrastructure: install restic on any machine, point it at pCloud
*or* a USB drive with the password, restore Vaultwarden first, then rebuild with the
vault password.
### 11. USB air-gap — plug-and-go cold copy
A **udev rule on `fisi` matching an allowlist of known drive serials** triggers a
systemd unit / script that: mounts the drive, confirms it is an expected drive, runs
**`restic copy` from the local repo → a restic repo on the USB drive** (same
password → ciphertext if lost/stolen), runs `restic check` on the USB copy, unmounts,
and **notifies via ntfy** with the result. Only allowlisted serials trigger anything —
a rogue USB does nothing.
`restic copy` (not rsync) so the USB is itself a valid restic repo, restorable
directly in a break-glass with nothing else alive. Drives are rotated and **stored
off-site** — a second geographic off-site copy independent of pCloud.
### 12. Failure alerting — guard against silent death
Success/failure pings alone miss the worst case (*the job silently stopped running*):
- **Dead-man's-switch:** every successful nightly run pings an **Uptime Kuma push
monitor**; no ping in ~25 h → alert.
- **Immediate failure → ntfy** on any job or dump-step error.
- **Weekly `restic check`** for repo integrity → alert on corruption.
- **Tier-1 restore-verify failures → ntfy.**
- *(Later)* emit last-success timestamp + repo size as Prometheus metrics for a
Grafana panel (fits ADR-018's monitoring direction; not required for v1).
### 13. Schedule
- **Nightly backup run (~02:0004:00),** driven by `fisi` (pull): per host →
run dumps → pull paths read-only → `restic` snapshot → `restic forget --prune`
`rclone sync` → pCloud. Sequential, off-hours.
- **Tier-1 restore-verify:** weekly, rolling one service per run, on `ubongo`.
- **Tier-2 DR rehearsal:** semi-annual on staging; ≥1/year exercises the paper path.
- **USB air-gap:** manual, approximately monthly, whenever a drive is docked.
## Consequences
- boma now has a defined, end-to-end backup policy that closes the gap ADR-011 left
open; "backup-first" and "snapshot + backup" are no longer assumed.
- Every service role that holds state must declare its backup contract (`backup__*`
vars + `BACKUP.md`); stateless services declare `backup__state: false`. Cost:
per-service declarations and a rendered doc to maintain (mitigated by the new-role
runbook step + checklist gate).
- **pCloud is off-site but sync-coupled**`rclone sync` propagates deletions (a
prune, or a malicious wipe of `fisi`'s repo, replicates to pCloud). The **USB
air-gap drive is the only truly immutable copy**; pCloud's own file-version history
is enabled as a secondary cushion.
- **`fisi` is the crown-jewel host** — it holds an encrypted copy of all state, so it
receives full `base` hardening and tight access. restic encryption means a stolen
`fisi`, USB drive, or pCloud blob yields ciphertext only.
- **pCloud's 1 TB is the off-site capacity ceiling.** Data-only backups fit for years
at homelab scale; flag for `/capacity-review` if the repo trends toward ~1 TB.
- Recovery time under Model A (full Ansible run + data restore) is potentially hours —
slower than a VM-image restore. PBS/Model B is explicitly deferred, not rejected.
- The paper break-glass must be kept current (restic password + vault password). An
outdated paper sheet is the one failure mode this ADR cannot prevent mechanically —
the semi-annual DR rehearsal is the human control.
Full design rationale and worked examples: `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-10-backup-strategy-design.md`.
Build path (roles, topology, tests): `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-06-10-backup-strategy.md`.
## Related
ADR-002 (security baseline: hardening applied to `fisi`), ADR-004 (one service = one
role; per-service doc conventions), ADR-008 (testing methodology; Molecule harness
reused for Tier-1), ADR-011 (update management: backup-first rule now grounded),
ADR-015 (`ubongo` recovery model; `mamba` break-glass clone; bare-Debian invariant),
ADR-017 (`VERIFY.md` checks reused in Tier-1 restore-verify), ADR-018 (logging/Alloy
→ ntfy alerting path), ADR-019 (Proxmox tags; `backup_hosts` group), ADR-021
(render-from-data pattern: `access__*`/`ACCESS.md``backup__*`/`BACKUP.md`;
runbook+gate governance model).

View file

@ -22,10 +22,20 @@
- **Model / form factor:** _TBD (x86-64 mini-PC / USFF, e.g. N100 or refurb micro)_
- **CPU:** _TBD (target 4 cores, x86-64)_
- **RAM:** _TBD (target 16 GB)_
- **Storage:** _TBD (target 250 GB SSD/NVMe)_
- **Storage:** 1 TB NVMe (ThinkCentre M70q Tiny; i3-10100T, 16 GB) — over-spec for Tier-1 restore-verify (ADR-022)
- **NICs:** _wired GbE_
- **Notes:** _always-on; control plane + AI-worker + local test runner (ADR-015); not a Proxmox guest_
### fisi (backup node — outside the cluster; provisional)
- **Model / form factor:** HP Elite 600 G9 (tower)
- **CPU:** i-series (12th-gen), x86-64 — featherweight for a data-only restic node
- **RAM:** 16 GB+ (TBD exact)
- **Storage:** OS NVMe + **2× 8 TB HDD in a mirror** (ZFS/mdraid → 8 TB usable, survives one disk)
- **NICs:** wired GbE
- **Notes:** off-cluster pull backup node (ADR-022); owns the restic repo, runs rclone→pCloud,
docks the rotated USB air-gap drives. **Pending:** SATA power cable to the HDDs.
Crown-jewel host → full `base` hardening. Assignment provisional (revisit when all hardware on hand).
_(repeat for pve1, pve2, askari)_
## 2. Network gear
@ -54,7 +64,8 @@ Physical totals per node. Integers; `ram_gb` and `disk_gb` may be decimals.
|------|-------|--------|---------|
| pve0 | 20 | 64 | 4000 |
| pve1 | 20 | 64 | 4000 |
| ubongo | 4 | 16 | 250 |
| ubongo | 4 | 16 | 1000 |
| fisi | 4 | 16 | 8000 |
## 5. Capacity notes

View file

@ -103,7 +103,18 @@ rendered from that data; the admin-API path must `firewall_ref` an entry in the
`/check-access <rolename>` proves the documented paths are live — part of the
service-clearance gate (`docs/security/service-checklist.md`).
### 12. Commit
### 12. Write the per-service backup record (stateful services)
For a **stateful** service role, copy `docs/backup/service-backup-template.md` to
`roles/<rolename>/BACKUP.md` and populate the role's `backup__*` data (`backup__service`,
`backup__paths`, `backup__dumps``cmd` + `dest` per logical dump — and `backup__quiesce`;
ADR-022). Prefer logical dumps (`pg_dump`/`mysqldump`) over file-level DB copies. `BACKUP.md`
is rendered from that data. A **stateless** service sets `backup__state: false` with a
reason and gets no `BACKUP.md`. Once the backup node exists, `/check-backup <rolename>`
proves the declared state is captured — part of the service-clearance gate
(`docs/security/service-checklist.md`).
### 13. Commit
```bash
git checkout -b role/<rolename>

View file

@ -47,7 +47,10 @@ This checklist is the generic **bar**. Each service answers it in its own
## Operability (security-adjacent)
- [ ] Logs go somewhere reviewable (central aggregation when available)
- [ ] Backup/restore is covered if the service holds state
- [ ] Backup/restore recorded and verifiable (ADR-022): a stateful service carries
`backup__*` data, `roles/<service>/BACKUP.md` is rendered, and `/check-backup`
reports the declared paths/dumps captured in the latest snapshot — or the service
sets `backup__state: false` with a reason. Deviations → `docs/security/accepted-risks.md`.
- [ ] Passed Level 4 service-UI verification (`/verify-service`) against staging — the
service has a populated `roles/<service>/VERIFY.md` and its critical journeys
verified (ADR-008 Level 4 / ADR-017)

View file

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# Design — Backup & disaster recovery strategy
- **Date:** 2026-06-10
- **Status:** Approved design — pending implementation plan
- **Status:** Approved design — implementation plan written; Plan 1 (foundation) complete (see ADR-022)
- **Resolves:** `docs/TODO.md` item 3.8 ("ensure the right things are backed up,
incl. DB dumps") and `docs/CAPABILITIES.md` §9 (backup engine / off-site / air-gap,
all "planned")
@ -113,15 +113,20 @@ database. Each **service role declares its backup needs** in role vars — the s
render-from-data pattern boma uses for `access__*`/`ACCESS.md` (ADR-021):
```yaml
backup__paths: # bind-mount dirs / files holding state
backup__service: nextcloud # identifier; matches the role / compose project
backup__state: true # false = stateless → no BACKUP.md (pair with a reason)
backup__paths: # bind-mount dirs / files holding state ([] = none)
- /srv/nextcloud/data
backup__predump: # optional: command that emits an app-consistent dump
cmd: "docker compose exec -T db pg_dump -U {{ ... }} nextcloud"
dest: "nextcloud-db.sql"
backup__dumps: # logical app-consistent dumps (list; [] = none)
- cmd: "docker compose exec -T db pg_dump -U {{ ... }} nextcloud"
dest: nextcloud-db.sql
backup__quiesce: false # true = stop→back up→restart escape hatch
```
(ADR-022 is authoritative for the contract.)
The pull orchestrator reads these (rendered from inventory) and, per service: SSH in →
run `predump` → pull the dump + declared paths read-only → `restic` snapshot. A
run the dumps → pull the dump files + declared paths read-only → `restic` snapshot. A
service with **no** `backup__paths` is explicitly "nothing to back up" (declared, not
silent).
@ -219,7 +224,7 @@ anything (a rogue USB does nothing).
Success/failure pings alone miss the worst case (*the job silently stopped running*):
- **Dead-man's-switch:** every successful nightly run pings an **Uptime Kuma push
monitor** (already in the planned stack); no ping in ~25 h → alert.
- **Immediate failure → ntfy** on any job or `predump` error.
- **Immediate failure → ntfy** on any job or dump-step error.
- **Periodic `restic check`** (weekly) for repo integrity → alert on corruption.
- **Tier-1 restore-verify failures → ntfy.**
- *(Later)* emit last-success timestamp + repo size as Prometheus metrics for a
@ -228,7 +233,7 @@ Success/failure pings alone miss the worst case (*the job silently stopped runni
### 13. Schedule
- **Nightly backup run (~02:0004:00),** driven by `fisi` (pull): per host →
`predump` → pull paths read-only → `restic` snapshot → `restic forget --prune`
run dumps → pull paths read-only → `restic` snapshot → `restic forget --prune`
(Decision 9) → `rclone sync` → pCloud. Sequential, off-hours.
- **Tier-1 restore-verify:** weekly, rolling one service, on `ubongo`.
- **Tier-2 DR rehearsal:** semi-annual on staging; ≥1/year exercises the paper path.
@ -240,7 +245,7 @@ Success/failure pings alone miss the worst case (*the job silently stopped runni
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
docker_hosts / etc. │ fisi (backup node) │
┌───────────┐ SSH │ pull orchestrator (reads backup__* ) │
│ service A │◀─────────│ 1. ssh host → run predump (pg_dump…) │
│ service A │◀─────────│ 1. ssh host → run dumps (pg_dump…)
│ + DB │ pull RO │ 2. pull dump + backup__paths (read-only)│
└───────────┘─────────▶│ 3. restic snapshot → local repo (mirror)│
┌───────────┐ │ 4. restic forget --prune (GFS) │