Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
19dd89b875 Re-challenge accepted risks; adopt CIS hardening + IDS
Walked the seeded accepted-risk register (R1-R4) and turned inherited gaps into
deliberate decisions:

- Supply chain (R1): tightened to required baseline hygiene (digest pinning,
  official/verified images); active scanning deferred — stays an accepted risk
- CIS (R2): adopted as a positive decision — CIS Debian L1+L2 (base role) + CIS
  Docker (docker_host + service checklist); app layer via the checklist
- SELinux/AppArmor (R3): AppArmor becomes a baseline control (CIS-enforced);
  register keeps a clean "no SELinux" accept
- IDS (R4): adopt AIDE (baseline via CIS) + Suricata on OPNsense + active alerting

Register shrinks from 4 inherited gaps to 2 deliberate accepts. ADR-002 gains a
Hardening standard section; STATUS + TODO 15 track the (unbuilt) implementation,
including the CIS L2 partition impact on VM provisioning (ADR-006).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-04 15:15:39 +02:00
f338bccd46 Expand ADR-002 into a security baseline + strategy
Add a managerial security frame on top of the host baseline: explicit threat
model (opportunistic external, lateral movement/blast radius, operator/agent
error; supply chain accepted-lower-priority), security principles, and four
governance mechanisms that ADR-002 establishes and links out to:

- docs/security/service-checklist.md — per-service security bar (referenced
  from the new-role runbook)
- docs/security/accepted-risks.md — living accepted-risk register (R1-R4)
- planned /security-review skill (TODO 8.5)
- agent guardrails in CLAUDE.md "what Claude must not do"

STATUS.md records the frame as present (manual enforcement) and /security-review
as planned-not-built.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-04 14:39:51 +02:00
88210db09c Add hardware reference & capacity-evaluation design spec
Brainstormed design for docs/hardware/reference.md (physical compute +
network gear + workload placement intent), a stdlib-only capacity-scan.py,
and an on-demand /capacity-review skill that reports to docs/hardware/reviews/.
Mirrors the repo-scan -> /review-repo -> docs/reviews triad.

TODO additions: schedule /capacity-review later and decide its usage-stats
source (Proxmox RRD vs the Prometheus/Loki/Grafana/Alloy stack) before
building any hook (8.4); reevaluate the stdlib-only script policy (#14).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-01 09:59:16 +02:00
11af84938d Add kaizen friction log and schedule the kaizen-loop setup
docs/FRICTION.md: a running log of friction/gotchas/recurring-fixes/unused tooling,
seeded with this session's real signals — raw material for the periodic kaizen
review. docs/TODO.md: schedule building /retro in ~1 week, and record the Claude-setup
decision. (Also carries your earlier backlog edits.)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-30 22:05:40 +02:00
45ab6ced01 Purge residual .vault_pass references (review R1-R5)
Point ADR-005, the new-host runbook, CONTRIBUTING, and AGENTS at the
rbw/Vaultwarden flow instead of a .vault_pass file. Also record the cron-section
idea in docs/TODO.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-30 19:17:25 +02:00
de38d1c68b Rename backlog to docs/TODO.md and fix references
Match the uppercase convention of the other top-level docs; includes the new
Scheduled-work and sanity-check items, and repoints references in STATUS.md and
the /review-repo command.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-30 19:01:22 +02:00
Renamed from docs/todo.md (Browse further)