sjat
19dd89b875
Walked the seeded accepted-risk register (R1-R4) and turned inherited gaps into deliberate decisions: - Supply chain (R1): tightened to required baseline hygiene (digest pinning, official/verified images); active scanning deferred — stays an accepted risk - CIS (R2): adopted as a positive decision — CIS Debian L1+L2 (base role) + CIS Docker (docker_host + service checklist); app layer via the checklist - SELinux/AppArmor (R3): AppArmor becomes a baseline control (CIS-enforced); register keeps a clean "no SELinux" accept - IDS (R4): adopt AIDE (baseline via CIS) + Suricata on OPNsense + active alerting Register shrinks from 4 inherited gaps to 2 deliberate accepts. ADR-002 gains a Hardening standard section; STATUS + TODO 15 track the (unbuilt) implementation, including the CIS L2 partition impact on VM provisioning (ADR-006). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| 001-architecture.md | ||
| 002-security.md | ||
| 003-toolchain.md | ||
| 004-docker-model.md | ||
| 005-bootstrapping.md | ||
| 006-terraform.md | ||
| 007-network.md | ||
| 008-testing.md | ||
| 009-provisioning-handoff.md | ||
| 010-forgejo-ci.md | ||
| 012-hardware-capacity.md | ||