boma/docs/ROADMAP.md
sjat 684718f4a5 docs(netbird): M4b done — STATUS/ROADMAP/risks/friction
netbird_coordinator built + applied to askari (first service role, dashboard live).
STATUS: new "real and working" row + askari/coordinator rows updated. ROADMAP: M4b
done, M5 (peer enrol) next, recorded the v0.72.4 combined-container/embedded-Dex/
no-Coturn reality. accepted-risks R3: Coturn -> STUN wording. FRICTION: single-file
bind-mount stale-inode gotcha + check-before-first-deploy artifact.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-16 07:48:53 +02:00

206 lines
11 KiB
Markdown

# ROADMAP — boma build order
High-level **build order** for the project. Almost everything in `docs/decisions/`
(the ADRs) is *designed, not built* — this file sequences that backlog into milestones
and records *why* the order is what it is.
- **What is built vs planned:** `STATUS.md` (ground truth — always check there first).
- **The backlog of decisions:** `docs/TODO.md` (this roadmap sequences it).
- **The design rationale:** `docs/decisions/` (ADRs).
This is a **living document**: update it as milestones land (move them to `STATUS.md`),
as ordering changes, or as new milestones appear. Each milestone gets its own
spec → plan → implementation cycle (`docs/superpowers/specs/` then `…/plans/`) when it
comes up; this file stays high-level.
_Last updated: 2026-06-11._
---
## Strategy — "remote-access first" (Approach A)
One focused track now (**Off-site / Remote-access**), a **procurement gate**, then the
**Cluster** track. Cross-cutting/ongoing work runs underneath both.
**Why this order.** The only physical machine that exists today is `ubongo` (the control
node); the Proxmox cluster is a procurement decision, not yet made. The nearest-term goal
— reach `ubongo` from `mamba` / a work laptop while on the move — needs only things
already available or cheap to spin up (`askari` at Hetzner, the laptops). Doing the
remote-access track first:
1. **delivers the mobile-access goal in the first phase**, and
2. **doubles as the proving ground** for boma's core machinery — the first real *service
role* (NetBird), the `base` role on a *real, internet-facing* host, the `offsite_hosts`
pattern, public DNS + ACME, the backup contract, and `rbw`/vault in anger — all on two
cheap, low-stakes hosts **before** spending on the cluster.
Cluster hardware is then procured *after* those patterns are proven and a
`/capacity-review` informs the sizing — so the spend happens once, with knowledge.
Rejected alternatives: **B — procure now, build strictly bottom-up** (mobile access lands
late; spend precedes any proven pattern). **C — two parallel tracks** (for a solo operator
this collapses into interleaving with extra context-switching cost).
---
## Phase 1 — Off-site / Remote-access
Delivers mobile access to `ubongo`; proves the machinery. Ordered by *real* dependencies.
### M1 · boma's DNS home — a new domain at Gandi, managed as code
Register a **new Swahili-themed domain at Gandi** for boma and manage its records **as
code (IaC)**. Greenfield, not a migration: investigating the existing domains ruled them
out as boma's home — `baobab.band` is the **live legacy homelab** (Cloudflare; vaultwarden
/ nextcloud / matrix in daily use), and `ziethen.dk` is the **family's primary email**
(Fastmail); moving either's authoritative DNS risks breaking production. A fresh domain is
zero-risk and *born at Gandi*.
- **Driver:** values/sovereignty (Gandi) + a clean, decoupled home so boma builds without
endangering anything live. `baobab.band`'s Cloudflare exit / V4 decommission is a
**separate, later track**, not part of this build. `ziethen.dk` is untouched.
- **IaC approach:** follow boma's grain — internal DNS is already Ansible-rendered and
Terraform owns *no* DNS (CLAUDE.md), so **public DNS is Ansible-managed too** (Gandi
LiveDNS via an Ansible module — exact module pinned in M1's spec, verified per ADR-014).
- **Naming scheme (decided):** three tiers (on boma's new domain, `<boma-domain>`) —
`<host>.boma.<boma-domain>` (infra, internal-only) · `<service>.<boma-domain>`
(home/cluster services, split-horizon) · `<service>.askari.<boma-domain>` (off-site/VPS,
public). **`nyumbani` dropped.** Home services are **mesh/LAN-only by default** (no
public record; reached over LAN or the NetBird mesh), with public Gandi records only for
deliberate exceptions. The NetBird mesh carries the `<boma-domain>` match-domain to
road-warriors (resolver = dns1/dns2 over `wt0`); a `*.<boma-domain>` ACME **DNS-01**
wildcard cert (Gandi API) gives even unexposed services real TLS. Resolves TODO 4 and
review finding O12.
- **Records as a new/updated ADR:** amends ADR-007 — boma's public zone is
`<boma-domain>` at Gandi LiveDNS managed as code; the three-tier naming scheme;
`nyumbani` removed; mesh/LAN-only default; `baobab.band` (legacy, Cloudflare) is out of
scope.
- **Maps to:** ADR-007 (network/DNS), ADR-016 (mesh DNS), TODO 4 (**resolved here**).
### M2 · `askari` provisioned + under Ansible
Provision the Hetzner VPS **as IaC with Terraform** (Helsinki / Debian 13, behind a
TF-managed Hetzner Cloud Firewall), bring it into `offsite_hosts`, and bootstrap it.
**Shipped as cx23/x86** (CAX11/ARM was out of stock EU-wide on 2026-06-14 — same-spec
x86, cheaper). Design: `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-14-askari-provisioning-design.md`.
- **Decided:** Terraform owns `askari`'s existence — generalizes ADR-006 from "Proxmox VM
existence" to **Proxmox + Hetzner** (new `hetznercloud/hcloud` provider, `hetzner_vm`
module, `offsite` stack). Token via `TF_VAR_hcloud_token` from `vault.hetzner.token`.
- **Proves:** the `offsite_hosts` pattern, the TF→Ansible handoff for a non-Proxmox host
(`tf_to_inventory.py` extended), bootstrap of a non-cluster host. Closes review finding
O6 (`offsite_hosts` missing from `hosts.yml`).
- **Amends:** ADR-006 (TF scope), ADR-009 (offsite handoff), ADR-020 (Hetzner Cloud
Firewall = perimeter), ADR-007/016 (`askari` TF-provisioned, not "added manually").
### M3 · `base` matured to a "remote-access-sufficient" subset — ✅ DONE
Added the `hardening` concern to `base` (sshd drop-in key-only + `PermitRootLogin no`;
fail2ban sshd jail 5/1h; ADR-002) and **applied it to askari** by tag
(`make deploy PLAYBOOK=site LIMIT=askari TAGS=hardening`) — SSH still works, fail2ban
active. Full CIS L1/L2, auditd, AppArmor, AIDE remain deferred to Phase 2 (TODO 15).
- **NetBird agent → M4** (deferred from M3: it enrolls against the coordinator, which
doesn't exist until M4 — ADR-016's coordinator-first bootstrap order).
- **Host firewall on askari + ubongo hardening → M5** (applying default-deny pre-mesh
would lock out SSH; the Hetzner Cloud Firewall is askari's perimeter until then).
- **Spec/plan:** `docs/superpowers/{specs,plans}/2026-06-14-base-ssh-fail2ban-m3*`.
- **Maps to:** ADR-002 (security baseline), ADR-020 (firewall — built, not yet applied),
TODO 15 (the rest of hardening → Phase 2).
### M4 · NetBird control plane on `askari` — first real service role
Built in two phases. **M4a (platform) — ✅ DONE:** Docker on askari + boma's standard
**Caddy** reverse proxy (ADR-024), proven by `https://test.askari.wingu.me` serving a
valid Let's Encrypt cert (HTTP-01; the Gandi **DNS-01** path is now built + proven —
2026-06-15, see ADR-024 — for mesh/LAN-only cluster services).
Firewall opened 80/443/3478. Spec/plan: `…2026-06-14-netbird-coordinator-m4-design.md` /
`…2026-06-14-m4a-docker-caddy.md` / `…2026-06-14-m4b-netbird.md`.
**M4b — ✅ DONE (2026-06-16):** the `netbird_coordinator` service role, deployed to askari.
Reality differed from the original plan (captured fresh per ADR-014): NetBird **v0.72.4**
ships a **single combined `netbird-server`** container (management + signal + relay + STUN
+ **embedded Dex** IdP at `/oauth2`) plus `dashboard:v2.39.0` — **no separate signal/relay
container and no Coturn**. Fronted by the M4a Caddy via gRPC-h2c + WebSocket + path routing.
Dashboard live at `https://netbird.askari.wingu.me` (valid LE cert); `/api` auth-gated.
**M5 (enrol peers) is next** — incl. the first-boot `/setup` admin + setup keys.
- **First exercise of:** the service-role conventions (`SECURITY.md` / `VERIFY.md` /
`ACCESS.md` / `BACKUP.md`), public **TLS / ACME**, and the **backup contract**
NetBird's management datastore is *stateful*, so it gets encrypted off-host backup
(ADR-016 §recovery, ADR-022).
- **Open design choice (decide in M4's spec):** a minimal ACME-terminating reverse proxy
(e.g. Caddy) just for NetBird on `askari`, vs leaning on NetBird's bundled setup.
- **Maps to:** ADR-016 (mesh), ADR-004 (one service = one role), ADR-021 (access),
ADR-022 (backup), ADR-008/017 (VERIFY), accepted-risk R3 (askari public surface).
### M5 · Enroll peers → goal reached
NetBird agent on `ubongo` (the `wt0` path appears), then NetBird **clients on `mamba` +
the work laptop** → `ubongo` is reachable from anywhere. **← the mobile-access goal lands
here.**
- **Critical ordering:** NetBird-on-`ubongo` **before** applying `base` default-deny to
`ubongo`. Hardening first would lock out SSH (no mesh path yet). Once the mesh `wt0`
path exists, apply default-deny and set `base__firewall_control_addr` for the LAN
fallback (ADR-021's `ssh-from-control`, already built/dormant).
- **Maps to:** ADR-016, ADR-021 (SSH ladder: `wt0` + ssh-from-control), ADR-020.
---
## Gate — Procurement decision
Run `/capacity-review` (intent-based) to size the cluster, **then procure the Proxmox
hardware**. Every core pattern (service role, base-on-real-host, DNS+ACME, backup, access)
has by now been rehearsed on two cheap hosts, so the spend happens once and informed.
- **Maps to:** ADR-012 (hardware & capacity), `/capacity-review`.
---
## Phase 2 — Cluster (gated on procurement; coarse until M5 is near)
Canonical dependency order:
1. **Terraform provisioning**`terraform init`/apply the Proxmox VM module; regenerate
inventory via `make tf-inventory` (ADR-006, ADR-009).
2. **`base` full** — CIS L1/L2, auditd, AppArmor (enforce), AIDE, packages, users; the
VM disk layout for CIS L2 is decided **before** provisioning (ADR-002, TODO 15).
3. **`docker_host`** — real Docker engine + Compose, daemon hardening, `nftables.d`
container rules (currently a scaffold; ADR-004, ADR-020).
4. **`dns` role** — render the internal zone from inventory (ADR-007).
5. **Auth + reverse proxy** — Authentik + **Caddy** (ADR-024): the foundation every
service sits behind with authentication (ADR-002).
6. **Monitoring** — Loki + Grafana Alloy (logging, ADR-018) + Prometheus/exporters +
Uptime Kuma; decide which alerts live where (TODO 3.6).
7. **Service roles** — PhotoPrism, email, indexers, … (`docs/CAPABILITIES.md`); each
clears `docs/security/service-checklist.md` and carries its standard files.
8. **`backup` role + `fisi` pull node** — restic Model A, pCloud + USB air-gap (ADR-022).
9. **Forgejo Actions CI** — runner + workflows (ADR-003/010, TODO 1).
---
## Underneath both — Cross-cutting / ongoing
- **Accept ADR-011** (update management) — resolve its 6 open questions before the first
scheduled patch run (TODO 16).
- **Kaizen `/retro`** + keep appending to `docs/FRICTION.md` (TODO 11); **`/security-review`**
skill (TODO 8.5); **`/review-repo` fortnightly cron** + headless email (TODO 8.1);
`scheduled_jobs` role (TODO 8.3).
- **User-notification function** — ntfy / matrix / email so tools + AI can reach the
operator (TODO 9; ties to ADR-011 control channel).
### Parked decisions — decide when they bite, not before
- Split-horizon FQDN with or without `nyumbani` (TODO 4) — likely settled in M1.
- Central database server vs per-app databases (TODO 3.9) — at the service phase.
- Script-dependencies policy: stdlib-only vs selective libraries (TODO 14).
- Keep the custom Molecule base-image method as testing matures (TODO 3.10).
---
## Next step
**M1 (Gandi DNS migration, IaC)** design is written —
`docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-11-public-dns-gandi-migration-design.md`. Next: user
review → implementation plan.